Skip to main content
Stainless Steel
Market

Technical guide

Stainless Steel Corrosion Resistance Chart

Corrosion resistance is a system result, not a permanent grade score. Chemistry, temperature, deposits, crevices, stress, fabrication and cleaning can change performance.

First questionExact medium and concentration
Localized riskChlorides, crevices and deposits
Final decisionService evidence plus design review

Decision summary

Classify the corrosion mechanism before comparing grades

Uniform corrosion, pitting, crevice corrosion, stress-corrosion cracking and galvanic effects require different data and controls.

General corrosion

Define every chemical species, concentration, temperature, aeration, flow and expected corrosion allowance.

Pitting and crevice corrosion

Chlorides, temperature, deposits, gasket geometry and stagnant zones can dominate selection.

Stress-corrosion cracking

Tensile stress, chloride exposure and temperature interact; fabrication residual stress matters.

Galvanic corrosion

Identify connected metals, area ratio, electrolyte and electrical continuity.

Intergranular risk

Confirm grade, carbon control, heat treatment, welding and any required corrosion test.

Microbiologically influenced corrosion

Review water source, nutrients, stagnation, biofilm, cleaning and operating history.

Reference table

Qualitative corrosion screening chart

This matrix indicates grade families to review first. It is not a guarantee and does not replace chemical-specific data, testing or a corrosion specialist.

Environment304L starting review316L starting reviewDuplex / higher-alloy reviewData still required
Dry indoor atmosphereOften reviewedOften reviewedUsually selected for another dutyHumidity, contaminants, cleaning
Outdoor industrial atmosphereCase-specificOften reviewedConsider for severe exposure or strengthSalt deposition, pollution, drainage
Fresh waterCase-specificOften reviewedConsider for warmer or contaminated waterChloride, temperature, oxygen, stagnation
Chloride splash or coastalElevated localized-corrosion riskCase-specificDuplex or higher alloy may be reviewedChloride, wet-dry cycle, crevices, finish
Seawater contactSpecialist reviewSpecialist reviewHigher-alloy duplex, super-austenitic or nickel alloy may be requiredTemperature, flow, biology, crevices, cathodic protection
Acid or process chemicalChemical-specific reviewChemical-specific reviewSpecial alloy review may be requiredFull composition, concentration, temperature, impurities

Terms such as often reviewed and case-specific are screening language only. A grade can fail in an unfavorable design or contaminated environment.

Working method

Create a defensible corrosion-selection brief

The most useful inquiry describes the whole exposure, component design and acceptable consequence of damage.

Describe the medium completely

List normal, cleaning and upset chemistry, concentration, pH, impurities, gases, solids and biological activity.

Map operating conditions

Provide temperature, pressure, velocity, aeration, stagnation, wet-dry cycles and exposure duration.

Show corrosion-sensitive geometry

Identify crevices, gaskets, deposits, heat-transfer surfaces, welds, dead legs and dissimilar-metal contacts.

Define verification

Specify literature basis, coupon or laboratory testing, corrosion allowance, inspection plan, passivation and documentation.

Limits and escalation

Do not convert a screening chart into a service guarantee

Chloride alone is incomplete

Temperature, oxygen, pH, crevices, deposits and stress change localized-corrosion risk.

Finish and fabrication matter

Heat tint, embedded iron, rough welds and poor drainage can reduce practical performance.

Laboratory tests have limits

Standard tests compare controlled conditions; they do not reproduce every field mechanism or design detail.

Cleaning is part of service

Acids, hypochlorites, disinfectants and rinse quality can be more aggressive than normal operation.

Interactive planning aid

Identify the data needed for a corrosion review

Choose the dominant exposure. The result gives a cautious starting family and the missing service data.

Frequently asked questions

Stainless steel corrosion resistance FAQ

No. 316 often improves localized-corrosion resistance relative to 304, but it can still pit, crevice-corrode or crack in unsuitable chloride, temperature or stress conditions.
No. Duplex grades offer useful strength and chloride resistance, but fabrication, phase balance, temperature range, product availability and the exact environment must be reviewed.
No. Cleaning and passivation can remove contamination and support a clean passive surface, but they cannot replace adequate alloy selection or good design.
Not generally. Accelerated tests are comparative under defined conditions and should not be converted directly into field life without a validated correlation.

Method, sources and review

Traceable sources and review status

Prepared by: Stainless Steel Market Editorial · Technical source review: Website Technical Team · Last updated: 16 September 2026

The chart is qualitative screening guidance. Final selection requires current source data, complete service conditions, design and fabrication review, and testing or specialist advice where consequences are significant.

Corrosion service context

Compare corrosion resistance against the actual exposure, not a grade label alone.

A corrosion chart should be read with chloride level, temperature, concentration, crevice conditions, product form and the inspection or maintenance plan.

  • Exposure chemistry
  • Temperature margin
  • Maintenance plan

Engineering and sourcing support

Request stainless against the actual corrosion environment

Send chemistry, temperature, flow, crevices, stress, cleaning, design life, tests, quantity and destination.