Skip to main content
Stainless Steel
Market
Home / Technical Resources / 301 vs 316Ti Stainless Steel
Stainless steel grade comparison

301 vs 316Ti Stainless Steel

Compare 301 and 316Ti stainless steel by chemistry, work-hardening response, room-temperature strength, chloride corrosion resistance, welding, formability, product form and the final manufacturing route used for the component.

Quick answer: choose 301 when cold working is used to create high strength, spring performance or a lightweight formed component. Choose 316Ti when molybdenum-enhanced corrosion resistance, welding and service in more aggressive process or chloride-bearing environments are more important.

Cold-work strength vs enhanced corrosion resistance

301
EN 1.4310 · UNS S30100
  • Structure Austenitic
  • Typical C 0.10%
  • Typical Cr 17.0%
  • Typical Ni 7.0%
  • PRE ≈17
  • Key feature Work hardening
316Ti
EN 1.4571 · UNS S31635
  • Structure Austenitic
  • Typical C 0.02%
  • Typical Cr 17.2%
  • Typical Ni 10.1%
  • Typical Mo 2.1%
  • PRE ≈24

Technical basis: Outokumpu Core 301/4310 and Supra 316Ti/1.4571. Typical composition is shown for comparison; final acceptance must follow the governing specification and MTC.

M03 · Decision summary

301 or 316Ti stainless steel: which one should you specify?

The choice is usually between mechanical efficiency and corrosion-service margin. 301 is attractive when cold work can be used to create high strength. 316Ti adds molybdenum and titanium-stabilized chemistry for more demanding corrosion and welded-service conditions.

Decision first: use 301 for spring strip and high-strength cold-formed parts when the environment is mild enough. Use 316Ti when chloride exposure, process chemicals, welded construction or corrosion reliability is more important than maximum cold-work strength.
Choose 301

Cold-work strength controls the component

Best for Springs, precision strip, stamped components and thin high-strength cold-formed parts.
Not recommended for Applications where chloride pitting resistance is the primary material requirement.
Key trade-off Strong work hardening improves final strength but increases forming load, springback and machining difficulty.
Alternative 304L when welding and general corrosion matter more than chloride resistance.
Choose 316Ti

Corrosion and welded service control the design

Best for Chemical process equipment, food and pharmaceutical equipment, wet environments and components exposed to moderate chlorides.
Not recommended for Applications that depend on 301-style spring temper and very high cold-worked strength.
Key trade-off Molybdenum and additional nickel increase alloy content and generally increase material cost.
Alternative Duplex or higher-alloy grades when chloride severity exceeds the practical 316Ti envelope.
Reconsider both

Environment exceeds the useful range of both grades

Review when Warm seawater, concentrated chlorides, severe crevices, chloride SCC, strong reducing acids or high-temperature furnace service apply.
Why 316Ti improves chloride resistance but is not immune to pitting, crevice corrosion or chloride SCC.
Alternative Duplex, super duplex, 904L, 254 SMO or a high-temperature alloy depending on the controlling failure mode.
Engineering reversal conditions: chloride concentration alone is not enough. Temperature, pH, deposits, crevices, oxygen availability, stress, surface finish, cleaning method and shutdown conditions can all change the correct alloy choice.
M04 · Technical data

301 vs 316Ti stainless steel properties

Ask an Engineer

301 and 316Ti should be compared in the same product condition wherever possible. 301's final strength can change substantially with cold work, while 316Ti selection is often controlled by molybdenum-enhanced corrosion resistance and welded service.

Request Technical Quote

Typical chemical composition

Typical manufacturer values by mass. Use the governing standard and material test certificate for final acceptance.

Element / feature 301 / S30100 316Ti / S31635 Selection significance Basis
Carbon, C 0.10% 0.02% 316Ti's low carbon improves resistance to sensitization after welding. Typical manufacturer chemistry
Chromium, Cr 17.0% 17.2% Chromium levels are relatively close; Mo creates the larger corrosion-performance difference. Outokumpu typical values
Nickel, Ni 7.0% 10.1% 316Ti contains more nickel and has a more stable austenitic alloy balance. Outokumpu typical values
Molybdenum, Mo No intentional addition 2.1% Key 316Ti advantage for localized corrosion resistance in many chloride-bearing environments. Outokumpu typical values
PRE ≈17 ≈24 316Ti has the stronger pitting-resistance alloy balance. PRE comparison
Microstructure Austenitic Austenitic Both are austenitic, but 301 is less stable under heavy cold deformation. Grade classification

Cold-rolled mechanical properties at 20°C

EN 10088-2 reference values for cold-rolled coil and sheet.

Property 301 / 1.4310 316Ti / 1.4571 Unit Selection meaning
Rp0.2 250 240 MPa Similar starting proof strength in this cold-rolled condition.
Rp1.0 280 270 MPa Again relatively close before additional cold work.
Rm 600–950 530–680 MPa 301 has a much wider and higher tensile-strength range.
Minimum elongation 40 40 % Both retain useful ductility in the cited condition.
Cold-work strengthening Very high Moderate — This is one of the main reasons to specify 301.

316Ti mechanical properties by flat-product condition

EN 10088-2 values. Do not apply one product condition to another without verification.

316Ti product form Rp0.2 Rp1.0 Rm Elongation
Cold rolled coil / sheet 240 MPa 270 MPa 530–680 MPa 40%
Hot rolled coil / sheet 220 MPa 260 MPa 530–680 MPa 40%
Quarto plate 220 MPa 260 MPa 520–670 MPa 45%

Corrosion and fabrication comparison

Real corrosion performance depends on temperature, chloride concentration, pH, crevices, surface finish and mechanical stress.

Factor 301 316Ti Why it matters Buyer action
Chloride pitting resistance Lower Improved by Mo 316Ti's approximately 2.1% Mo improves localized-corrosion resistance. State chloride concentration, temperature and cleaning regime.
Crevice corrosion More limited Improved, not immune Stagnant chloride solution can still challenge 316Ti. Identify gaskets, deposits and stagnant zones.
Welding Weldable with procedure control Strong general-purpose choice 316Ti's low carbon improves resistance to intergranular corrosion after welding. Specify weld method, filler and post-weld cleaning.
Cold forming Very high work hardening Good austenitic formability 301 gains strength rapidly, but requires higher forming force. Define bend radius, final temper and springback.
Marine / seawater exposure Not preferred Engineering review required 316Ti is better, but warm seawater can still exceed its pitting / crevice capability. Do not approve from “marine grade” terminology alone.
Chloride SCC Possible Possible Both are austenitic and can be susceptible under sufficient chloride, stress and temperature. Consider duplex where SCC resistance is a primary requirement.

Typical physical properties

Metric reference values from EN 10088-1 manufacturer data.

Property 301 316Ti Condition Engineering significance
Density 7.9 kg/dm³ 8.0 kg/dm³ Reference Small difference in mass.
Elastic modulus 200 GPa 200 GPa 20°C Same cited elastic stiffness.
Thermal expansion 16.0 ×10⁻⁶/K 16.0 ×10⁻⁶/K 20–100°C Similar thermal movement.
Thermal conductivity 15 W/m·K 15 W/m·K 20°C No useful selection difference.
Specific heat 500 J/kg·K 500 J/kg·K 20°C Same reference value.
Electrical resistivity 0.73 Ω·mm²/m 0.75 Ω·mm²/m 20°C Small difference.
Magnetizable No* No* Annealed reference Cold work can increase magnetic response, especially in 301.
Key point: the physical-property differences are small. The real engineering split is 301's high cold-work strengthening versus 316Ti's titanium-stabilized, molybdenum-alloyed corrosion performance.
M05 · Product form matrix

Product forms and supply routes for 301 and 316Ti

301 is especially relevant to cold-rolled precision strip and strength-controlled formed parts. 316Ti has a broader process-industry supply chain across flat products and many fabricated product forms.

Availability note: this is a technical supply-route guide, not a live inventory statement. Confirm actual thickness, width, diameter, temper, finish, product standard, quantity and mill availability before ordering.
Product / route 301 316Ti Status Procurement note
Cold-rolled coil / sheet Typical product form Typical product form Typical product form Confirm gauge, width, finish and mechanical condition.
Hot-rolled coil / sheet Supplier-dependent Typical product form Confirm availability 316Ti has established hot-rolled flat-product data.
Precision strip Key product route Supplier-dependent Confirm availability For 301, specify final tensile or temper condition.
Spring / temper-rolled strip Key 301 route Project-specific Project-specific Do not substitute 316Ti without checking spring force and final strength.
Quarto plate Supplier-dependent Published product form Confirm availability Relevant to heavy welded process equipment.
Pipe / tube Not primary 301 route Common alloy family Product-standard dependent Use the actual pipe or tube standard instead of flat-product data.
Bar / machined components Supplier-dependent Common alloy family Confirm availability Confirm bar standard, diameter and machining condition.
Welded process equipment Application review required Established application family Project-specific State media, chlorides, cleaning process and weld-finish requirement.
Flanges / valves Not primary 301 route Established application family Project-specific Confirm forged, cast or wrought governing specification.
M06 · Grade selector

Use strength and corrosion conditions to choose 301 or 316Ti

Start with the failure mode: is the component primarily limited by mechanical strength and spring behavior, or by corrosion, chlorides and welded service?

Preliminary result

Define the controlling failure mode

Choose the requirement that limits service life: 301 is primarily a cold-work-strength solution, while 316Ti is primarily a corrosion and welded-service solution.

Strength Chlorides Welding
Send Conditions to an Engineer
STEP 01 Define mechanics

Spring force, yield, tensile strength and fatigue.

STEP 02 Define corrosion

Chlorides, pH, chemicals, crevices and deposits.

STEP 03 Define fabrication

Cold forming, welding, machining and surface treatment.

STEP 04 Define product form

Strip, sheet, plate, tube, bar or fabricated equipment.

M08 · Applications & limitations

Where 301 works, where 316Ti is justified, and where another alloy is required

Discuss Your Application

301 is strongest when the manufacturing route uses cold work to create final mechanical performance. 316Ti is strongest when corrosion exposure, welding and process-industry service control the material decision.

301

Typical reasons to choose 301

  • Springs
  • Precision strip
  • Press plates
  • Conveyor components
  • Mixer blades
  • Automotive gaskets
  • High-strength stamped components
316Ti

Typical reasons to choose 316Ti

  • Chemical and petrochemical equipment
  • Pulp and paper equipment
  • Food and beverage equipment
  • Pharmaceutical equipment
  • Medical applications
  • Process tanks and piping systems
  • Flanges and valves
Review

Conditions that can require another alloy

  • Warm or stagnant seawater
  • High chloride concentration
  • Severe crevice conditions
  • Chloride stress-corrosion cracking risk
  • Strong reducing acids
  • Very high-temperature oxidation service
  • Extremely aggressive chemical processing

Failure modes that can reverse the recommendation

Chloride pitting
316Ti contains molybdenum, which improves resistance to localized chloride attack compared with 301. However, sufficiently high chloride, temperature or oxidizing potential can still cause pitting.
Crevice corrosion
Even 316Ti can corrode in tight stagnant crevices where chloride becomes concentrated and oxygen transport is restricted. Gasket design, deposits and cleanability should be reviewed.
Chloride stress-corrosion cracking
Both grades are austenitic. Under the right combination of tensile stress, temperature and chloride exposure, stress-corrosion cracking can occur. Duplex stainless steel may be a better option where this mechanism dominates.
Weld sensitization and heat tint
316Ti's low carbon reduces sensitization risk after welding, but it does not eliminate surface contamination or heat tint. Appropriate post-weld cleaning, pickling or passivation may still be important for corrosion performance.
301 work hardening and springback
301 becomes stronger rapidly during deformation. This allows high-strength components, but also increases forming load, springback and risk of local cracking if the process is not designed around the grade.
Magnetic response after cold working
Both grades are nominally austenitic in the annealed condition, but cold working can increase magnetic response. The effect is typically much more pronounced in metastable 301.
Fatigue in high-strength 301 components
High static strength does not automatically guarantee fatigue life. Surface defects, bend radii, residual stress and local cold-work concentration should be evaluated for cyclic components.
Using “marine grade” as the only 316Ti design criterion
The phrase “marine grade” is not enough for engineering approval. Warm seawater, stagnant crevices and deposits can exceed 316Ti's practical corrosion resistance. State the actual water chemistry, temperature and exposure condition.
Inspection guidance: for 316Ti process equipment, inspect crevices, weld heat tint, deposits and localized pitting. For cold-worked 301 components, monitor fatigue cracking, formed edges and changes in spring performance.

Material image comparison

Reserved positions for approved product imagery showing each material option. These blocks can be replaced directly with Media Library images later.

301 stainless steel

Use an approved product-form or surface-detail image.

316Ti stainless steel

Use an approved product-form or application image.

M10 · Standards & equivalence

301 and 316Ti stainless steel grade designations

Cross-reference tables help identify the alloy family, but substitution should only be approved after checking chemistry, product form, mechanical condition, corrosion environment and the governing standard.

Designation / standard 301 316Ti Procurement caveat
ASTM / AISI type 301 316Ti Grade name alone does not define product condition.
UNS S30100 S31635 Use UNS for exact alloy identification.
EN material number 1.4310 1.4571 Common European material-number mapping.
EN name X10CrNi18-8 X6CrNiMoTi17-12-2 The 316Ti name reflects its low carbon and molybdenum alloying.
JIS reference SUS301 SUS316Ti Verify the applicable JIS product standard before substitution.
GB reference Verify against project standard Verify against project standard Do not rely on an informal equivalence chart.
ASTM A240/A240M Flat-product reference Flat-product reference Check current revision and required mechanical condition.
EN 10088-2 Flat-product reference Flat-product reference Mechanical properties depend on product form.
EN 10151 Relevant to spring strip Product-specific verification Important where 301 tensile / spring class is specified.
PRE reference Approx. 17 Approx. 24 PRE is a useful alloy-comparison tool, not a complete corrosion guarantee.
EN flat-product referenceEN 10088-2 where applicableEN 10088-2 where applicableUse exact delivery condition and product form.
EN long-product referenceEN 10088-3 where applicableEN 10088-3 where applicableLong-product properties must be checked separately from flat-product data.
Material certificateEN 10204 3.1 when specifiedEN 10204 3.1 when specifiedState certificate, testing and traceability requirements in the RFQ.
Delivery conditionState cold-work level, annealed or temper-rolled condition, dimensions and finish.State annealed condition, dimensions, finish and elevated-temperature requirement.Do not assume a common condition across forms, dimensions or suppliers.
Selection inputcold-work strength, elevated-temperature service, welding and corrosion exposureUse the governing specification for final acceptance.
301 · EN 10151 Relevant where stainless spring strip and cold-work strength classes are specified.
301 · EN 10088-2 Cold-rolled flat-product mechanical-property reference.
316Ti · ASTM A240/A240M Common specification family for stainless plate, sheet and strip.
316Ti · EN 10088-2 Reference for cold-rolled, hot-rolled and plate mechanical properties.

Do not approve a 301-to-316Ti or 316Ti-to-301 substitution from grade family alone. Final strength, cold-work condition, molybdenum requirement, corrosion environment and product standard must all be checked.

M11 · Direct answers

301 vs 316Ti stainless steel FAQ

Direct answers to common engineering and procurement questions about 301 versus 316Ti stainless steel.

What is the main difference between 301 and 316Ti stainless steel?

301 is primarily selected for high work-hardening capacity and strength generated by cold deformation. 316Ti is a titanium-stabilized, molybdenum-alloyed austenitic stainless steel selected for improved corrosion resistance and welded process service.

Which is stronger, 301 or 316Ti?

In the cited cold-rolled condition, 301 has a tensile range of 600–950 MPa compared with 530–680 MPa for 316Ti. 301 can also be cold worked to substantially higher strength levels.

Which has better corrosion resistance?

316Ti generally provides the stronger corrosion-resistance package, especially where chloride pitting is a concern. Its approximately 2.1% molybdenum is a major difference from 301.

Is 316Ti always safe in seawater?

No. 316Ti is more resistant to chlorides than 301, but warm seawater, stagnant conditions and tight crevices can still cause pitting or crevice corrosion. Duplex or higher-alloy grades may be required.

Which is better for springs?

301 is normally preferred. It is widely used as precision and temper-rolled strip because it develops high strength during cold working.

Which grade is better for welding?

316Ti is usually the stronger general-purpose welded-service choice. Its low carbon content reduces sensitivity to intergranular corrosion after welding.

Can 316Ti replace 301 in a high-strength part?

Not automatically. If the design depends on 301's high cold-worked strength, switching to 316Ti can require more thickness or a different forming and strength specification.

Can 301 replace 316Ti to reduce material cost?

Only when the actual corrosion environment allows it. Removing 316Ti's molybdenum-based corrosion margin solely to reduce material cost can increase pitting, crevice-corrosion or maintenance risk.

M13 · Sources & technical review

Technical basis for this 301 vs 316Ti comparison

Get Technical Support

This page separates cold-work strengthening, molybdenum-driven corrosion resistance, welded-service behavior and product condition so 301 and 316Ti are not treated as interchangeable austenitic grades.

Primary technical references

  • Outokumpu Core Range Datasheet 301/4310 chemistry, cold-rolled mechanical properties, physical properties and product-form guidance.
  • Outokumpu Core 301/4310 High work-hardening capacity, spring applications, precision strip and high mechanical-load components.
  • Outokumpu Supra Range Datasheet 316Ti/1.4571 chemistry, EN mechanical properties, PRE, physical properties and corrosion positioning.
  • Outokumpu Supra 316Ti/1.4571 titanium-stabilized CrNiMo alloy, process-industry applications, weldability and product-form guidance.
  • ASTM A240/A240M Plate, sheet and strip chemistry and mechanical-property specification family.
  • EN 10088-1 Grade designation and physical-property reference.
  • EN 10088-2 Flat-product technical delivery and mechanical-property reference.
  • EN 10151 Relevant where 301 stainless spring strip and strength classes apply.

Page accountability

Author [Author name]

Add the real person responsible for the material-selection content.

Author credentials / role [Author credentials / role]

Use the actual materials, engineering or procurement role.

Technical reviewer [Technical reviewer name]

Add a real reviewer with relevant stainless-steel, corrosion or fabrication experience.

Reviewer credentials / role [Reviewer credentials / role]

Do not publish invented reviewer qualifications.

Review date [Reviewed date]

Add only after the technical review has actually been completed.

Page build date

23 September 2026

Status

Technical datasets prepared for review.

M14 · Ask an engineer

Still deciding between 301 and 316Ti?

Send the actual strength, forming, welding and corrosion requirements so the grade can be reviewed against the finished component and real service environment.

  • 301, 316Ti or alternative grade under consideration
  • Coil, sheet, precision strip, plate, tube, bar or fabricated component
  • Thickness, width, diameter and tolerance
  • Required yield and tensile strength
  • 301 final temper or cold-work condition
  • Required spring force or fatigue condition
  • Stamping, bending or drawing requirement
  • Welding process and joint details
  • Post-weld cleaning / pickling / passivation requirement
  • Chloride concentration and water chemistry
  • Normal and peak operating temperature
  • pH and process-chemical exposure
  • Crevices, deposits or stagnant zones
  • Surface finish and cleanliness requirement
  • Applicable ASTM, EN, JIS or customer standard
  • Quantity, destination and due date
  • MTC, inspection and documentation requirement

Send your material requirement

For a useful 301 vs 316Ti review, include final 301 temper or required strength, chloride and chemical exposure, weld details, dimensions, quantity, destination, standard and certificate requirements.

SSM Quote Request
Ask an Engineer