301 vs 316Ti Stainless Steel
Compare 301 and 316Ti stainless steel by chemistry, work-hardening response, room-temperature strength, chloride corrosion resistance, welding, formability, product form and the final manufacturing route used for the component.
Cold-work strength vs enhanced corrosion resistance
- Structure Austenitic
- Typical C 0.10%
- Typical Cr 17.0%
- Typical Ni 7.0%
- PRE ≈17
- Key feature Work hardening
- Structure Austenitic
- Typical C 0.02%
- Typical Cr 17.2%
- Typical Ni 10.1%
- Typical Mo 2.1%
- PRE ≈24
Technical basis: Outokumpu Core 301/4310 and Supra 316Ti/1.4571. Typical composition is shown for comparison; final acceptance must follow the governing specification and MTC.
301 or 316Ti stainless steel: which one should you specify?
The choice is usually between mechanical efficiency and corrosion-service margin. 301 is attractive when cold work can be used to create high strength. 316Ti adds molybdenum and titanium-stabilized chemistry for more demanding corrosion and welded-service conditions.
Corrosion and welded service control the design
Environment exceeds the useful range of both grades
301 vs 316Ti stainless steel properties
301 and 316Ti should be compared in the same product condition wherever possible. 301's final strength can change substantially with cold work, while 316Ti selection is often controlled by molybdenum-enhanced corrosion resistance and welded service.
Typical chemical composition
Typical manufacturer values by mass. Use the governing standard and material test certificate for final acceptance.
| Element / feature | 301 / S30100 | 316Ti / S31635 | Selection significance | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon, C | 0.10% | 0.02% | 316Ti's low carbon improves resistance to sensitization after welding. | Typical manufacturer chemistry |
| Chromium, Cr | 17.0% | 17.2% | Chromium levels are relatively close; Mo creates the larger corrosion-performance difference. | Outokumpu typical values |
| Nickel, Ni | 7.0% | 10.1% | 316Ti contains more nickel and has a more stable austenitic alloy balance. | Outokumpu typical values |
| Molybdenum, Mo | No intentional addition | 2.1% | Key 316Ti advantage for localized corrosion resistance in many chloride-bearing environments. | Outokumpu typical values |
| PRE | ≈17 | ≈24 | 316Ti has the stronger pitting-resistance alloy balance. | PRE comparison |
| Microstructure | Austenitic | Austenitic | Both are austenitic, but 301 is less stable under heavy cold deformation. | Grade classification |
Cold-rolled mechanical properties at 20°C
EN 10088-2 reference values for cold-rolled coil and sheet.
| Property | 301 / 1.4310 | 316Ti / 1.4571 | Unit | Selection meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rp0.2 | 250 | 240 | MPa | Similar starting proof strength in this cold-rolled condition. |
| Rp1.0 | 280 | 270 | MPa | Again relatively close before additional cold work. |
| Rm | 600–950 | 530–680 | MPa | 301 has a much wider and higher tensile-strength range. |
| Minimum elongation | 40 | 40 | % | Both retain useful ductility in the cited condition. |
| Cold-work strengthening | Very high | Moderate | — | This is one of the main reasons to specify 301. |
316Ti mechanical properties by flat-product condition
EN 10088-2 values. Do not apply one product condition to another without verification.
| 316Ti product form | Rp0.2 | Rp1.0 | Rm | Elongation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold rolled coil / sheet | 240 MPa | 270 MPa | 530–680 MPa | 40% |
| Hot rolled coil / sheet | 220 MPa | 260 MPa | 530–680 MPa | 40% |
| Quarto plate | 220 MPa | 260 MPa | 520–670 MPa | 45% |
Corrosion and fabrication comparison
Real corrosion performance depends on temperature, chloride concentration, pH, crevices, surface finish and mechanical stress.
| Factor | 301 | 316Ti | Why it matters | Buyer action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloride pitting resistance | Lower | Improved by Mo | 316Ti's approximately 2.1% Mo improves localized-corrosion resistance. | State chloride concentration, temperature and cleaning regime. |
| Crevice corrosion | More limited | Improved, not immune | Stagnant chloride solution can still challenge 316Ti. | Identify gaskets, deposits and stagnant zones. |
| Welding | Weldable with procedure control | Strong general-purpose choice | 316Ti's low carbon improves resistance to intergranular corrosion after welding. | Specify weld method, filler and post-weld cleaning. |
| Cold forming | Very high work hardening | Good austenitic formability | 301 gains strength rapidly, but requires higher forming force. | Define bend radius, final temper and springback. |
| Marine / seawater exposure | Not preferred | Engineering review required | 316Ti is better, but warm seawater can still exceed its pitting / crevice capability. | Do not approve from “marine grade” terminology alone. |
| Chloride SCC | Possible | Possible | Both are austenitic and can be susceptible under sufficient chloride, stress and temperature. | Consider duplex where SCC resistance is a primary requirement. |
Typical physical properties
Metric reference values from EN 10088-1 manufacturer data.
| Property | 301 | 316Ti | Condition | Engineering significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 7.9 kg/dm³ | 8.0 kg/dm³ | Reference | Small difference in mass. |
| Elastic modulus | 200 GPa | 200 GPa | 20°C | Same cited elastic stiffness. |
| Thermal expansion | 16.0 ×10⁻⁶/K | 16.0 ×10⁻⁶/K | 20–100°C | Similar thermal movement. |
| Thermal conductivity | 15 W/m·K | 15 W/m·K | 20°C | No useful selection difference. |
| Specific heat | 500 J/kg·K | 500 J/kg·K | 20°C | Same reference value. |
| Electrical resistivity | 0.73 Ω·mm²/m | 0.75 Ω·mm²/m | 20°C | Small difference. |
| Magnetizable | No* | No* | Annealed reference | Cold work can increase magnetic response, especially in 301. |
Product forms and supply routes for 301 and 316Ti
301 is especially relevant to cold-rolled precision strip and strength-controlled formed parts. 316Ti has a broader process-industry supply chain across flat products and many fabricated product forms.
| Product / route | 301 | 316Ti | Status | Procurement note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold-rolled coil / sheet | Typical product form | Typical product form | Typical product form | Confirm gauge, width, finish and mechanical condition. |
| Hot-rolled coil / sheet | Supplier-dependent | Typical product form | Confirm availability | 316Ti has established hot-rolled flat-product data. |
| Precision strip | Key product route | Supplier-dependent | Confirm availability | For 301, specify final tensile or temper condition. |
| Spring / temper-rolled strip | Key 301 route | Project-specific | Project-specific | Do not substitute 316Ti without checking spring force and final strength. |
| Quarto plate | Supplier-dependent | Published product form | Confirm availability | Relevant to heavy welded process equipment. |
| Pipe / tube | Not primary 301 route | Common alloy family | Product-standard dependent | Use the actual pipe or tube standard instead of flat-product data. |
| Bar / machined components | Supplier-dependent | Common alloy family | Confirm availability | Confirm bar standard, diameter and machining condition. |
| Welded process equipment | Application review required | Established application family | Project-specific | State media, chlorides, cleaning process and weld-finish requirement. |
| Flanges / valves | Not primary 301 route | Established application family | Project-specific | Confirm forged, cast or wrought governing specification. |
Use strength and corrosion conditions to choose 301 or 316Ti
Start with the failure mode: is the component primarily limited by mechanical strength and spring behavior, or by corrosion, chlorides and welded service?
Preliminary result
Define the controlling failure mode
Choose the requirement that limits service life: 301 is primarily a cold-work-strength solution, while 316Ti is primarily a corrosion and welded-service solution.
Send Conditions to an EngineerSpring force, yield, tensile strength and fatigue.
Chlorides, pH, chemicals, crevices and deposits.
Cold forming, welding, machining and surface treatment.
Strip, sheet, plate, tube, bar or fabricated equipment.
Where 301 works, where 316Ti is justified, and where another alloy is required
301 is strongest when the manufacturing route uses cold work to create final mechanical performance. 316Ti is strongest when corrosion exposure, welding and process-industry service control the material decision.
Typical reasons to choose 301
- Springs
- Precision strip
- Press plates
- Conveyor components
- Mixer blades
- Automotive gaskets
- High-strength stamped components
Typical reasons to choose 316Ti
- Chemical and petrochemical equipment
- Pulp and paper equipment
- Food and beverage equipment
- Pharmaceutical equipment
- Medical applications
- Process tanks and piping systems
- Flanges and valves
Conditions that can require another alloy
- Warm or stagnant seawater
- High chloride concentration
- Severe crevice conditions
- Chloride stress-corrosion cracking risk
- Strong reducing acids
- Very high-temperature oxidation service
- Extremely aggressive chemical processing
Failure modes that can reverse the recommendation
Chloride pitting
Crevice corrosion
Chloride stress-corrosion cracking
Weld sensitization and heat tint
301 work hardening and springback
Magnetic response after cold working
Fatigue in high-strength 301 components
Using “marine grade” as the only 316Ti design criterion
Material image comparison
Reserved positions for approved product imagery showing each material option. These blocks can be replaced directly with Media Library images later.
Use an approved product-form or surface-detail image.
Use an approved product-form or application image.
301 and 316Ti stainless steel grade designations
Cross-reference tables help identify the alloy family, but substitution should only be approved after checking chemistry, product form, mechanical condition, corrosion environment and the governing standard.
| Designation / standard | 301 | 316Ti | Procurement caveat |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASTM / AISI type | 301 | 316Ti | Grade name alone does not define product condition. |
| UNS | S30100 | S31635 | Use UNS for exact alloy identification. |
| EN material number | 1.4310 | 1.4571 | Common European material-number mapping. |
| EN name | X10CrNi18-8 | X6CrNiMoTi17-12-2 | The 316Ti name reflects its low carbon and molybdenum alloying. |
| JIS reference | SUS301 | SUS316Ti | Verify the applicable JIS product standard before substitution. |
| GB reference | Verify against project standard | Verify against project standard | Do not rely on an informal equivalence chart. |
| ASTM A240/A240M | Flat-product reference | Flat-product reference | Check current revision and required mechanical condition. |
| EN 10088-2 | Flat-product reference | Flat-product reference | Mechanical properties depend on product form. |
| EN 10151 | Relevant to spring strip | Product-specific verification | Important where 301 tensile / spring class is specified. |
| PRE reference | Approx. 17 | Approx. 24 | PRE is a useful alloy-comparison tool, not a complete corrosion guarantee. |
| EN flat-product reference | EN 10088-2 where applicable | EN 10088-2 where applicable | Use exact delivery condition and product form. |
| EN long-product reference | EN 10088-3 where applicable | EN 10088-3 where applicable | Long-product properties must be checked separately from flat-product data. |
| Material certificate | EN 10204 3.1 when specified | EN 10204 3.1 when specified | State certificate, testing and traceability requirements in the RFQ. |
| Delivery condition | State cold-work level, annealed or temper-rolled condition, dimensions and finish. | State annealed condition, dimensions, finish and elevated-temperature requirement. | Do not assume a common condition across forms, dimensions or suppliers. |
| Selection input | cold-work strength, elevated-temperature service, welding and corrosion exposure | Use the governing specification for final acceptance. | |
Do not approve a 301-to-316Ti or 316Ti-to-301 substitution from grade family alone. Final strength, cold-work condition, molybdenum requirement, corrosion environment and product standard must all be checked.
301 vs 316Ti stainless steel FAQ
Direct answers to common engineering and procurement questions about 301 versus 316Ti stainless steel.
What is the main difference between 301 and 316Ti stainless steel?
301 is primarily selected for high work-hardening capacity and strength generated by cold deformation. 316Ti is a titanium-stabilized, molybdenum-alloyed austenitic stainless steel selected for improved corrosion resistance and welded process service.
Which is stronger, 301 or 316Ti?
In the cited cold-rolled condition, 301 has a tensile range of 600–950 MPa compared with 530–680 MPa for 316Ti. 301 can also be cold worked to substantially higher strength levels.
Which has better corrosion resistance?
316Ti generally provides the stronger corrosion-resistance package, especially where chloride pitting is a concern. Its approximately 2.1% molybdenum is a major difference from 301.
Is 316Ti always safe in seawater?
No. 316Ti is more resistant to chlorides than 301, but warm seawater, stagnant conditions and tight crevices can still cause pitting or crevice corrosion. Duplex or higher-alloy grades may be required.
Which is better for springs?
301 is normally preferred. It is widely used as precision and temper-rolled strip because it develops high strength during cold working.
Which grade is better for welding?
316Ti is usually the stronger general-purpose welded-service choice. Its low carbon content reduces sensitivity to intergranular corrosion after welding.
Can 316Ti replace 301 in a high-strength part?
Not automatically. If the design depends on 301's high cold-worked strength, switching to 316Ti can require more thickness or a different forming and strength specification.
Can 301 replace 316Ti to reduce material cost?
Only when the actual corrosion environment allows it. Removing 316Ti's molybdenum-based corrosion margin solely to reduce material cost can increase pitting, crevice-corrosion or maintenance risk.
Technical basis for this 301 vs 316Ti comparison
This page separates cold-work strengthening, molybdenum-driven corrosion resistance, welded-service behavior and product condition so 301 and 316Ti are not treated as interchangeable austenitic grades.
Primary technical references
- Outokumpu Core Range Datasheet 301/4310 chemistry, cold-rolled mechanical properties, physical properties and product-form guidance.
- Outokumpu Core 301/4310 High work-hardening capacity, spring applications, precision strip and high mechanical-load components.
- Outokumpu Supra Range Datasheet 316Ti/1.4571 chemistry, EN mechanical properties, PRE, physical properties and corrosion positioning.
- Outokumpu Supra 316Ti/1.4571 titanium-stabilized CrNiMo alloy, process-industry applications, weldability and product-form guidance.
- ASTM A240/A240M Plate, sheet and strip chemistry and mechanical-property specification family.
- EN 10088-1 Grade designation and physical-property reference.
- EN 10088-2 Flat-product technical delivery and mechanical-property reference.
- EN 10151 Relevant where 301 stainless spring strip and strength classes apply.
Page accountability
Add the real person responsible for the material-selection content.
Use the actual materials, engineering or procurement role.
Add a real reviewer with relevant stainless-steel, corrosion or fabrication experience.
Do not publish invented reviewer qualifications.
Add only after the technical review has actually been completed.
23 September 2026
Technical datasets prepared for review.
Still deciding between 301 and 316Ti?
Send the actual strength, forming, welding and corrosion requirements so the grade can be reviewed against the finished component and real service environment.
- 301, 316Ti or alternative grade under consideration
- Coil, sheet, precision strip, plate, tube, bar or fabricated component
- Thickness, width, diameter and tolerance
- Required yield and tensile strength
- 301 final temper or cold-work condition
- Required spring force or fatigue condition
- Stamping, bending or drawing requirement
- Welding process and joint details
- Post-weld cleaning / pickling / passivation requirement
- Chloride concentration and water chemistry
- Normal and peak operating temperature
- pH and process-chemical exposure
- Crevices, deposits or stagnant zones
- Surface finish and cleanliness requirement
- Applicable ASTM, EN, JIS or customer standard
- Quantity, destination and due date
- MTC, inspection and documentation requirement
Send your material requirement
For a useful 301 vs 316Ti review, include final 301 temper or required strength, chloride and chemical exposure, weld details, dimensions, quantity, destination, standard and certificate requirements.